For Dancers, A Peerless Model
by Alan M. Kriegsman, Washington Post Staff Writer
The Washington Post, 23 June 1987 page D1
No one ever better fit Fred Astaire in the dancer's scheme of
things than Mikhail Baryshnikov, opening the tribute on the occasion of the
American Film
Institute's Life Achievement Award in 1981:
"I have been invited to say something about how dancers feel
about Fred Astaire," Baryshnikov said. "It's no secret. We hate him.
"He gives us complexes, because he's too perfect. His
perfection is an absurdity that's hard to face." Classical dancers could deal
with legendary rivals from
the past, such as Nijinsky, because their accomplishments were known from books
and from photographs that don't move, Baryshnikov said. With Astaire it
was another story:
"The problem with Astaire is that he's everywhere -- moving.
You know, you give your own performance and receive applause and you think
maybe, just
maybe, it was successful, and you go home ... and turn on the television to
relax and there he is. Making you feel nervous all over again.
"You remember the remark by Ilie Nastase about Bjorn Borg: 'We
are playing tennis, he is playing something else.' It's the same with Fred
Astaire -- we are
dancing, but he is doing something else."
Part of Astaire's power over the public had to do with the
uncanny ease of his dance mastery. It made him the envy of dance professionals
everywhere, who
knew that Astaire must be killing himself just as they all had to, but that in
Astaire's case it just never showed, even to the merest degree.
It also made him the despair of eligible males of any calling,
whose sweethearts expected them to be as agile, as suave, as fleet, as gallant,
as ardent and
attentive on the dance floor and off as Astaire always appeared to be. Anything
as easy as Astaire made dancing appear to be could obviously be picked up
instantly, by even the clumsiest of men -- wasn't it so?
Because the silver screen made Astaire automatically the most
widely seen dancer in history, he unquestionably inspired more dance careers
than can ever be
accurately tallied. As any dance journalist can tell you, nine times out of 10
the answer to the question "What led you into dancing?" turns out to be "Seeing
Fred Astaire pictures."
But Astaire's place in dance history will rest on far more
than his unprecedented efficacy as a role model. He created a uniquely versatile
fusion of tap and
ballroom dance, and revolutionized the filming of choreography with the riveting
intimacy and concentration of his movie duets and solos.
His celebrated series of black-and-white film classics with
Ginger
Rogers as his partner in the '30s helped Americans dance their way, even
if only vicariously,
out of the Great Depression and into fantasies of carefree romance. He turned
the dance duet from stylized courtship into a miniature dramatic form -- a love
story told with amazing succinctness and emotional punch. He gave the public
license to roam freely through any social milieu, with popular dances as the
universal passwords. Astaire looked perfectly at home in the top hat, white tie
and tails he privately loathed, but he looked just as comfortable in a sailor
suit.
Who but Astaire could have had every woman in America longing
to change places with a hat rack? And who but Astaire, in the mass medium of the
movies,
could have gotten away with a dance monologue as full of bitterness, anger and
frustration as the glass-smashing bar-top solo, "One for My Baby," in "The
Sky's the Limit"?
Unquestionably, Astaire owed much of his craft, style and step
vocabulary to the great black jazz tap artists of his time, such as
Bill (Bojangles)
Robinson, to
whom Astaire paid tribute in "Swing Time." But tap was not central to Astaire's
art as it was to theirs, and purely as a tap virtuoso, Astaire was nothing
special. As Charles (Honi) Coles has often put it, "Astaire was the greatest
dancer in the world -- I didn't say tap dancer."
Dance critic Arlene Croce made a similar point in her
matchless "The Fred Astaire & Ginger Rogers Book" of 1972, which had much to do
with the latter-day
revival of enthusiasm for Astaire films. "Nor could Astaire have won an
international tap-dancing contest," she wrote, "but who looks for mere technique
from
him? His 'peerlessness' is a legend; it means, not that there were no other
tap-dancers, but that there were no other Astaires. Above everything else, he
was
a master dramatist. Drama clings to every move he makes and to every move that
Rogers makes with him. And yet they do not act, they dance ... At the core
of their professionalism was a concentration upon dance as dance, not as
acrobatics or sexy poses or self-expression."
If one were asked to choose the single most highly developed,
intensely focused and sublime example of this concentration in Astaire's career,
one could
scarcely do better than the rapturous, brink-of-suicide fantasy with
Rogers to
the Irving Berlin number, "Let's Face the Music and Dance," in the film "Follow
the Fleet."
It was this concentration, perhaps, more than anything else,
that made Astaire the object of such unreserved adulation within all corners of
the dance
profession. Edward Villella once called Astaire "the personification of
neo-classicism within a popular American art form." Margot Fonteyn spoke of
Astaire's
"magic of magic," which made "dancing look easier than walking, more natural
than breathing."
In his recent, wonderfully comprehensive "Astaire Dancing: The
Musical Films," John Mueller recalls George Balanchine (who shared the first
round of Kennedy
Center Honors in 1978 with Astaire, as well as Marian Anderson, Richard Rodgers
and Artur Rubinstein) saying of Astaire:
"He is terribly rare. He is like Bach, who in his time had a
great concentration of ability, essence, knowledge, a spread of music. Astaire
has that same
concentration of genius; there is so much of the dance in him that it has been
distilled."
Mueller also tells an anecdote about
Jerome Robbins, whose
1983 ballet "I'm Old-Fashioned" actually incorporates film footage of Astaire
dancing (with Rita Hayworth) in its staging. During a trip to the Soviet Union, a reporter asked
Robbins to name the dancer who influenced him the most. "Oh, well, Fred
Astaire,"
Robbins replied. The journalist looked very surprised, so
Robbins asked what the
matter was. The reply: "Mr. Balanchine just said the same thing."
It is our very good fortune that Astaire's dance legacy will
remain far less perishable than most that history has bequeathed us. In
Baryshnikov's apt words:
"We are, of course, very lucky. His gift, captured in the
movies, is one we can all share forever. He was, he is, and he always will be,
our never-ending
legend."
© 1987 The Washington Post
|